Bitcoin is a path to true freedom

The State has failed individuals and this does not mean blaming one party or the "current administration.

Voting for the proper candidates or educating our leaders won't solve this issue.

In addition

the services and agencies used by future elected and unelected officials cannot continue with bitcoin.

Similar to arguments in finance, excessive settlement is not just adding bitcoin to existing paper networks

It must be an entirely alternative system in which sound funds are the world's dominant unit of account.

Bitcoin :

as a completely distrustless voluntary monetary network, runs counter in principle to a system that mediates and coerces the incentives of the world's participants.

On the contrary, the State is not based on volunteering or the participants' will, but on the act or threat of violence.

The State removes the value in one of the three ways:

Taxes, monetary expansion and confiscation.

Taxes :

Despite being portrayed as a constant duty of the citizen, it is nothing more than a veiled form of partial slavery.

If one of them is 100% taxed, you will not own anything from your business and you will have no way to get a property yourself, no different from the worshippers of the past times.

It is accurate to say that public property does not exist.

If I was part of the audience, why would I pay someone else for what I already have a stake in?

If taxes are fees, what point did I pay these fees in full or may I reject the services provided by the said fees?

Cash Expansion:

When someone exercises their right to issue a decree establishing more units of money.

As government authority grows to the point where it is now too big to exist

this sustainability strategy must happen.

While Keynesians will mock this fear and reject it from the Ivory Concession Tower

their perfect inflation of 3% of your purchasing power is stolen annually and given to the group of thieves of his choice.

Cronyism may be where these benefits are directed to rich companies. They may reallocate wealth to people who are motivated to refuse to work.

It may be a communist State, where new funds are divided between the coffers of ineffective government agencies.

Whatever the range of such cases, victims are the community's valuers.

The worker's legitimate fruits
taken by manipulation of his anticipated share of
value in the economy without his consent.

The third method of theft is direct confiscation.

When the need arises, Governments will use their monopoly on violence to claim their citizens' legitimate property.

It is difficult for distinguished Americans to imagine the consequences of imprisonment or death to resist such infringement of natural rights.

It happens constantly around the world, yet the media is doing its utmost to diminish its relevance.

Dutch farmers are besieged by their government in a strategic attempt to seize agricultural land from legitimate landlords.

The World Economic Forum's "nitrogen emissions" guidelines are the rationale for these efforts, which can be considered a malicious attack on food supplies where hunger can be used as a control tool.

While you may see your bank account not compensable

The fourth-largest bank in the world is Bank of China.
has declared its clients' current accounts to be "investment products"
disrupting the ability to withdraw.

The government has, of course, supported the move by demonstrating armoured force in branches that require protection as banks claim they are simply not because of their value.

Before the American could read these stories and gain immunity.

The Fifth Amendment to the Constitution (also known as Legality of Rights) clearly states that "[n] o] o deprivation of life, liberty or property

without due process

Nor may private property for public use be taken without fair compensation. "

In fact, the United States of America is a country with a growing rejection of the importance of individual freedoms. America may have avoided such violations because of citizens' right to personal armament, but there are clear campaigns to counter this too on a regular basis.

If expropriation is the only violation of societal abundance, it will suffice to abolish it.

The failure of the tax to actually fund the State's presence results in the calculation of the rational minds of the costs of the current situation. If the State didn't have a monopoly on violence, would it still exist?

There is likely to be more leadership rotation, but the root cause is still there:

The current Governor will exercise all his power to survive in a hostile world. The monopoly on the power to define money causes a deviation such as the financial death spiral described below.

It's sometime in 2050...

In this future, there is hope. Humanity thrives. Fiat's money surrendered to Bitcoin, the decentralized monetary network, and consumed almost all of the value of the world's paper wealth.

During years of violent volatile trade with global governments as public buyers

Bitcoin rose through bull and bear markets whose end was marked only by the 2033 Bitcoin International Treaty (B.I.T.) to dismantle central banks around the world for a new Bitcoin cash benchmark

100 years after Executive Order 6102 prohibiting individual ownership of gold by American citizens for a period of time.

Almost all governments came in North America, Europe, South America, South Asia, the Middle East and Africa

To adopt regional digital symbols supported by bitcoin (dollar, euro, peso, rupee, dinar, franc).

These currencies had a more palatable central control and insurance of a segment of the population. But since no one is forced to use it

The free market for exchange of value in bitcoin has flourished as a dominant unit.

Some countries in Oceania and Asia remain stubborn about difficult money supply such as China and Australia.

They did not participate in B.I.T. and prohibited the possession of any currency or alternative code, especially bitcoin.

Instead

They chose the controlled and coercive CBDCs route as they continued to steal their voters' wealth slowly.

Implementation of CBDC became easier when immigration was banned decades ago as citizens of some countries became mainly prisoners.

People in those areas essentially became machine pawns and lost almost all evidence of individuality.

As the bitcoin world has almost halted currency inflation, bitcoin's exchange rate has stabilized at around $25 million.

Human innovation and progress have gradually increased the purchasing power of all people in the free world as technology has shrunk assets.

Just two decades after the era of central banks ended,
governments also began to strip away other dominated areas of society.
The world quickly discovered the government's access constraints
when sound funds are at the root of all human action.

Since the turn of the century, USPS has had only three profitable years (2003-2006).

After decades of bleeding value, and even after years of integrating bitcoin as an international standard, it was clear that the system was not working.

The Constitution provides for the "establishment of post offices and postal routes" in article 1, section 8, section 7. Historically, it has been interpreted as in addition to "carrying, delivering and organizing mail."

in 2015

The Supreme Court declared the statement necessary because it retreated to a responsibility to the nation rather than a benefit.

As postal roads have become obsolete owing to the advancement of infrastructure, a decision has been taken to strip post offices of the free market in auctions for national, regional and even local institutions wishing to find profitability in postal services.

Local private postal services have circulated mailboxes because they provide increased privacy and security services for theft and reduce exposure to greater collection of personal information.

The Postmaster General is still able to maintain a small agency that can do nothing more than keep the mail industry safe on the free market and protect it.

The federal government no longer has the funds or the means to maintain unprofitable control over the industry. The invasive and costly "legal monopoly" of USPS is no longer.

Since spending on social care doubled year after year in 2020

there has been a steady annual increase.

With all the Government's intervention in the 1920s

it has become clear that the problem of poverty will not be solved by the State.

Having an option to burden others with one's livelihood has become an increasingly favourable option for the population.

Shortly after B.I.T. of 2033, confidence in the funds returned. That trust came in wanting to get it.

Many socialists and communists who defended well-being feared bitcoin could cause deflationary depression.

On the contrary, workers were found to be more diligent and there were a record number of job applications in many industries.

Companies were operating with competencies they never had because of the influx of willing workers.

This impact combined with deflationary funds caused commodity prices to decline steadily.

By 2043, the welfare state, at least for those who adopted bitcoin, had become almost a thing of the past.

The money was finally worth this effort. Private organizations funded by voluntary contributions have assisted at-risk groups such as orphans and widows in finding homes and jobs, respectively.

These organizations were more efficient and effective than government sponsorship because the goal was to reduce time in the program rather than empowering recipients of permanent benefits.

The police stopped funding it with fixed funds.

After nearly 35 years of profane political movement to defund the police, it resurfaced in the 1950s; But maybe not in the way expected.

States and major metro regions were institutions that became too efficient to operate.

The police were slow to respond, giving preferential treatment to secure rich areas and sacrificing low-income areas for crime and degradation.

Citizens receiving this service in certain neighbourhoods did not feel that the police properly defended their interests because their police did not reflect their values and were not motivated to do so.

The Government was paying them, so their incentives reflected that Government. With the growth of Bitcoin came less faith in debt-based investment bonds. Police stations have not been able to operate as in the past.

This has led to more armaments than ever before. In addition, they formed alliances in towns and neighbourhoods to help protect each other.

These security coalitions reacted faster to crime than any government police station because of the incentive to maintain their small areas.

For some communities, they had to adopt the services of an increasing number of private security companies that were growing at a time when State-owned police forces were weakening.

These groups did not feel at odds with the communities they serve because they were directly employed by communities rather than by the state.

Any serious imbalance in vision, the security party or client will not seek renewal at the end of the contract period.

Some security firms have even provided their clients with firearms instruction.

Instead of fearing its importance

the practice reduced crime against weak targets while creating companies

as trusted members of societies and thus prolonging the business relationship.

"Well-organized militia" has not been commonly practised since colonial times in history.

Politicians discouraged by fixed funds

As much as there was an incentive for fixed and unquantifiable funds, there was also a low assessment in the government's law-making positions.

This does not mean that members of Congress or senators no longer exist, but the laws that could affect them did not have the same gravity as they did under the functional standard.

There was no government funding for one industry over another, because the state only had enough money to maintain a much simpler presence.

There was little cost or benefit to companies to buy politicians' loyalty because each company and person were already paying much lower taxes compared to the past. It was better to put this bribery money into R&D or marketing.

Elected presidents found a similar fate to that of kings after the revolution of democracy in the early 20th century.

Because kings are sham figures based on a dynasty, presidents and prime ministers have become primarily elected figures for diplomatic participation and ambassadors.

The presidential executive order cannot go beyond the budget to implement it. It was the most renowned presidents of this era who protected people's property rights and helped generate ideas to make more industries operate without the hand of large corporations and the state.

Politicians are starting to come from all walks of life. They will take a short break from their industry to help actors in their field as a neutral entity that seeks to provide guidance to entire fields and industries.

This was a far cry from the past as jobs were created in the use of the law as a weapon for personal gain.

The discipline of "public policy" has become a pariah as a tool of manipulation

The State can no longer take irrational freedom to operate beyond

its capabilities because the world's best funds were auditable on the blockchain.

For this reason

for the first time in modern history
the life of a politician has become
a truly "civil servant."

But... We need the state.

It's quite a clear future, if Bitcoin is part of it, governments are shrinking dramatically in a variety of ways.

For that to happen, we must also change as people. In the past, mankind has often chosen its destiny with an inherent desire to have God's king within reach.

Around 1030 BC, Hebrews wished to choose a king like the Heathens except for "God who took them out of Egypt."

Colonel Louis Nicola proposed that George Washington take over the colonies after years of bloodshed in the revolution from the separation from the king they already had in London.

Washington strongly rejected :

The author believes there is a strong case for recognising the King's title, which would likely have some financial benefits.

The human desire for a strong state or sovereign entity, whether functional or subordinate, may have part of the desire to make others act or think as you will have.

There are a lot of people who want to tell you what to do and how to do it.

This runs counter to bitcoin, also known as "money for your enemies." Freedom advocates lose legitimacy without bitcoin as that hub by relying on a central monetary network.

These false witnesses indicate that we must trust a third party to preserve that freedom.

Bitcoin is distrustful

so why rely on someone else to let you make an economic decision

when that might interfere with their own incentives?

This is a significant issue on a global scale.
and if human nature is right, without bitcoin
it will reach America as well.

Death and taxation

"There are only two things confirmed in life: death and taxes." Bitcoin works for this. An institution that monopolizes violence and creates money can impose taxes and monetary deterioration on people.

The only options are acceptance or rejection. Rejection is the refusal to use or marginally participate in a fictitious economy. This was not a realistic prospect until bitcoin emerged, as it was the first significant external economic force since the legitimacy of gold was abolished in 1971.

State institutions around the world must now calculate the costs of adopting digital and decentralized fixed funds or maintaining the current status of unlimited currency.

Bitcoin is designed to replace the paper cash unit

The dollar as we know it is struggling for the same place in the food chain as bitcoin.

If bitcoin succeeds as a cash network for people

this would disrupt the dollar and other tools of all the things we have accepted

as usual : illegal penalties for the general public, cash smashes and border payments.

Bitcoin is literally necessary

to move forward with real freedom. Withdrawal from bitcoin is the choice of the slave economy.

bitcoin

Min menu

Pages

Bitcoin is a path to true freedom